Perception and use of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

Correlation with Academic Performance in University Students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59343/yuyay.v4i1.88

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Education, Academic Performance, Ethics, Education in Bolivia

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly prevalent in various activities undertaken by university students. In this context, the present document explores the relationship between the use of AI tools and the academic performance of students at the Universidad Privada Domingo Savio, Cochabamba campus. A random sample of 326 students was analyzed. The main objective was to examine the perception, usage, and impact of AI in the educational context. Through a quantitative and cross-sectional approach, data were collected to identify the primary AI tools employed, among which ChatGPT stood out as the most used. The results indicate that although there is a positive correlation between the use of AI and improved academic performance, it is not a fully determining factor. Specifically, 57% of students reported an improvement in their performance, while 41% did not perceive significant changes. Furthermore, the study reveals that students mainly use AI for research, text writing, and data analysis, while creative activities show lower adoption rates. Additionally, the results highlight that students are aware of the risks associated with AI use, such as dependency (22.89%) and plagiarism (16.57%), which raise concerns about the ethical use of these tools. The findings suggest the need for educational policies that promote responsible use and training initiatives to maximize the potential of AI in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ana Gabriela Zelaya-Guzmán, Universidad Privada Domingo Savio

    Ingeniera de la Producción. Master en Organización de Empresas y Proyectos Industriales por la Universidad Privada Boliviana. Directora de Planificación y Desarrollo Institucional de la Universidad Privada Domingo Savio.

References

Adams, R., Adeleke, F., Florido, A., Galdino, L., Grossman, N., Junck, L., & Stone, K. (2024). Global Index on Responsible AI. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en

Cabello-Ayzama, A. (2024). Implementación de inteligencia artificial en el derecho boliviano. YUYAY: Estrategias, Metodologías & Didácticas Educativas, 3(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.59343/yuyay.v3i2.68

CENIA. (2024). Índice Latinoamericano de Inteligencia Artificial.

CIDH. (2020). Resolución 1/2020: Pandemia y Derechos Humanos en las Américas.

Jung, J., & Katz, R. (2023). Impacto del COVID-19 en la digitalización de América Latina.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2023.102274

Liebrenz, M., Schleifer, R., Buadze, A., Bhugra, D., & Smith, A. (2023). Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing. The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e105–e106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00019-5

Planeta Formación y Universidades - GAD3. (2024). Inteligencia Artificial y la empleabilidad del futuro para estudiantes de educación superior.

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–459.

UNESCO. (2023, June 1). IA : la UNESCO moviliza a los Ministros de Educación de todo el mundo para una respuesta coordinada a ChatGPT. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2024). Guía para el uso de IA generativa en educación e investigación. https://www.unesco.org/es/open-access/cc-sa

Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168

Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Zhou, T., & Kim, J. H. (2024). Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0

Percepción y uso de la Inteligencia Artificial en la Educación Superior

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

Zelaya-Guzmán, A. G., Flores-Jara, P. M., Ortega-Pardo, S., & García-Coca, R. (2024). Perception and use of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Correlation with Academic Performance in University Students. YUYAY: Estrategias, Metodologías & Didácticas Educativas, 4(1), 100-120. https://doi.org/10.59343/yuyay.v4i1.88

Similar Articles

1-10 of 79

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.